Hop comparison
ADHA 1631 vs Mackinac
ADHA 1631 is a hop variety from USA; Mackinac is a dual-purpose hop from USA. Alpha acids: 10.5–13.5% for ADHA 1631 versus 9–13.3% for Mackinac, a similar bittering potential. Total oil: 1.1–2 versus 1.65 mL/100 g. ADHA 1631 has a clearly higher share of myrcene, the oil behind resinous, citrus and fruity notes. ADHA 1631 adds fruit punch, berry, pineapple; Mackinac, tropical, citrus, melon. Both stand out for papaya notes, an uncommon descriptor in the catalogue.
| ADHA 1631 | Mackinac | |
|---|---|---|
| Use | Hop variety | Dual-purpose hop |
| Origin | USA | USA |
| Year | – | 2014 |
| Breeder | Jamie Coggins (Latitude 46) | Great Lakes Hops (GLH) |
| Alpha acids (% w/w) | 10.5–13.5 | 9–13.3 |
| Beta acids (% w/w) | 5.7–7 | 2.8–4 |
| Co-humulone (% of alpha) | 31 | 35 |
| Total oil (mL/100 g) | 1.1–2 | 1.65 |
| Myrcene (% of oil) | 36.2 | 18.4 |
| Humulene (% of oil) | 19.9 | 25.9 |
| Caryophyllene (% of oil) | 4 | 12.5 |
| Farnesene (% of oil) | 0.5 | 1.8 |
| Linalool (% of oil) | – | 0.5 |
| Aroma families | tropical fruit, other fruit | citrus, tropical fruit, other fruit, spicy |
| Descriptors | fruit punch, berry, pineapple, mango, papaya | tropical, citrus, melon, papaya, spice |
| Sources | 1 | 1 |
See them in charts in the comparison tool →